Brand Architecture
Comparison matrix
| Dimension | AUNZ | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Tone | Professional, structured, modern | Bold, friendly, energetic |
| Audience | Client-facing communication | Talent-facing communication |
| Primary / Secondary Role | Periwinkle / Tron | Periwinkle / Rosy Pink |
| Typography Pairing | Manrope + Inter | Dosis + Lato |
| Graphic Style | Dots and pixels | Organic shapes and illustration |
Selected brand summary
Yoonet AU & NZ
Recommended usage: Client-facing — professionalism and clarity
Typography: Manrope + Inter
#8A9EFF AA (7.0:1)#98E9ED AAA (12.6:1)#EEEFF4 AAA (15.2:1)#181925 AAA (15.2:1)
Decision tree
If client-facing and professional
Choose: Yoonet AU and NZ
If talent-facing and engagement-heavy
Choose: Yoonet PH
Page Context
Purpose
Help teams select the right brand behavior before building screens.
Audience
Designers and engineers deciding the visual voice per feature or campaign.
Updated March 2026
Key Takeaways
- AUNZ and PH share core DNA but differ in tone and expression.
- Typography and color-role choices must stay brand-consistent.
- Use the decision tree before starting any new page or campaign.
Related Next Steps